In a significant move to rectify the long-standing issues faced by cadre officers within the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), the Supreme Court has mandated a comprehensive cadre review to be completed within six months. This directive encompasses all major CAPFs, such as the CRPF, BSF, ITBP, CISF, and SSB, and aims to address grievances that have persisted for years. The review, originally scheduled for 2021, has experienced numerous delays.
A bench consisting of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan has directed the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) to make an appropriate decision within three months after receiving an action taken report from the Ministry of Home Affairs. This report is anticipated to propose changes related to the cadre review, along with amendments to existing service and recruitment rules.
The court’s ruling was prompted by multiple petitions calling for Non-Functional Financial Upgradation (NFFU), structural reforms, and a reduction in the practice of assigning Indian Police Service (IPS) officers to senior positions within CAPFs. Petitioners contended that the ongoing practice undermines the career progression and decision-making authority of CAPF cadre officers.
During the proceedings, the bench acknowledged the government’s stance that IPS officers are crucial for maintaining the operational integrity of CAPFs. However, it highlighted the need for a gradual reduction in the number of deputation posts up to the Senior Administrative Grade (SAG) level over the next two years. This step is intended to enhance internal leadership and empower cadre officers to take on more significant roles in decision-making processes within their organizations.
The Supreme Court underscored the essential duties of CAPFs in safeguarding India’s borders and ensuring internal security, often under adverse conditions. The ruling asserted that cadre officers have exhibited exemplary commitment and deserve equitable opportunities for career advancement and acknowledgment.
While recognizing the government’s authority to establish deputation policies, the court emphasized that the influence of IPS officers or their associations should not dictate the extent or duration of deputation quotas. The operational needs of the CAPFs must align with the professional aspirations and morale of the cadre officers.
This landmark judgment is poised to initiate much-needed reforms in the personnel management of India’s paramilitary forces, addressing the systemic challenges that have hindered thousands of CAPF officers over the years. The Supreme Court’s decision is heralded as a turning point, promising a more equitable and effective framework for career progression within these critical forces.
